tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-140938929136406282.post6032440031660405095..comments2023-11-18T15:42:20.251-05:00Comments on DinoGoss: Panphagia & Aerosteon live!Matt Martyniukhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04220900229537564466noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-140938929136406282.post-64383418987581830922009-05-29T09:43:25.175-04:002009-05-29T09:43:25.175-04:00Thank goodness! I was just waiting for some yahoo ...Thank goodness! I was just waiting for some yahoo to rename the things in an obscure journal. . .Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16171447306687358664noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-140938929136406282.post-70133693017559408542009-05-28T23:35:37.748-04:002009-05-28T23:35:37.748-04:00Correct for all except the paper describing new an...Correct for all except the paper describing new ant species (our very first taxonomy paper) which was resolved at the time of publication by depositing CDs to libraries.Coturnixhttp://scienceblogs.com/clocknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-140938929136406282.post-4663105018175206332009-05-28T22:49:07.282-04:002009-05-28T22:49:07.282-04:00>So the valid publication date for Aerosteon is...>So the valid publication date for Aerosteon is now 2009, rather than 2008?<<br /><br />According to the ICZN, yes.Bill Parkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05941940882532354219noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-140938929136406282.post-39340735604576647402009-05-28T21:30:48.008-04:002009-05-28T21:30:48.008-04:00This is all post-Darwinius though, correct? So the...This is all post-Darwinius though, correct? So the valid publication date for Aerosteon is now 2009, rather than 2008?Matt Martyniukhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04220900229537564466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-140938929136406282.post-7090795625790327872009-05-28T21:09:24.678-04:002009-05-28T21:09:24.678-04:00Yes, they have all been addressed the same way - a...Yes, they have all been addressed the same way - all the taxonomy papers in PLoS ONE now describe valid taxonomic names. Thanks.Coturnixhttp://scienceblogs.com/clocknoreply@blogger.com