Sunday, September 8, 2013

Iridescence in Simple Feathers - The Case of the Blue Troodon

Iridescent feathers in troodontids - possible? Image by Matt Martyniuk, all rights reserved.
(Supreme dino fans may recognize the pose even from this small clip...)
I've written a lot about the various ways feathers get their color in order to create some rough guidelines for paleoartists restoring feathered stem-birds. I recently had a quick discussion over at DeviantArt with one of the best currently-working paleoartists around, Emily Willoughby, over the plausibility of a blue Troodon. The illustration in question is here. Note that it has a few other anatomical issues that make it somewhat less than a fully accurate rendition, but is the coloration one of them? I wasn't sure, so I did a little extra digging to find out. As usual, this research is cursory and I welcome any additional input on research or details I may have overlooked.



In one of my first posts on feather color mechanisms and their application to extinct groups, I noted that blue coloration is due entirely to structural color, rather than pigmentation, though pigment itself is usually a critical component of that structure. In iridescent feathers, the outer layer of keratin in the barbules (and often segmented and/or containing tiny air pockets) must be a certain thickness to scatter and refract the light in certain ways to create various colors. But, another component is the arrangement of melanin underneath the keratin layer. The thickness and arrangement of melanin layers is as important, if not more important, to the nature of the structural color as the overlying keratin. In fact, it is the distinctive arrangement of melanin alone that can clue researchers in to the presence of iridescence in fossil feathers, such as those of Microraptor zhaoianus (the keratin layer is usually not preserved). Feathers which lack this unique structure are usually matte in coloration, without any glossy sheen or iridescence.

Iridescent blue troodontids, from Dinosaur Revolution.
So, back to Troodon. Blue troodonts seem to be popular lately, possibly thanks to the depiction of blue, glossy, iridescent troodontids (probably of the species Pectinodon bakkeri, based on provenance) depicted in Dinosaur Revolution. Emily suggested that such depictions are highly implausible for the following reasons:

1. Troodonts, being large terrestrial stem-birds, would almost certainly have reduced feather complexity compared to flying or gliding forms, where the expense of maintaining complex feathers is more justified. 

I noted that there could be plausible exceptions, such as maintaining complex feathers for display purposes, but I had to admit that this is very unlikely and would be categorized as special pleading. In modern flightless birds, the complexity of feathers is one of the first things to go, first in terms of aerodynamic asymmetry (as in kakapo), and then in terms of degree of pennaceous structure (as in ostriches, kiwi, etc., which have lost their hooklets and reverted to easier to maintain plumulaceous vaned feathers--some details here). Emily noted that Troodon, which were large compared to plesiomorphic troodontids and with highly reduced arms compared to more basal, presumably somewhat more airborne paravians, would be pretty far gone into flightlessness and more akin to ratites, which I agree with. Even depicting them with well-defined, planar sets of vaned feathers, as in Dinosaur Revolution, is probably a mistake.

Diagram of feathers parts, Fernbank Science Center.
2. Given their likely low-complexity feathers, Troodon would not have been able to support structural color, and therefore could not have been blue.

This is where things get tricky. Are lower-complexity feathers really not capable of supporting structural color? It depends on what you mean by low-complexity. The most important component for creating structural color in feathers are the barbules of feathers, rather than the barbs or hooklets (Monge-Najera & Hernandez, 1994). It stands to reason, then, that feathers without barbules cannot have structural color, and therefore can't be blue. But while the feathers of very derived flightless birds lose their overall structural complexity, this is usually in the form of losing the hooklets and simplifying, rather than losing, the barbules. Indeed, a good example of the murkiness of declaring absolutes here is the case of the cassowary.

Some derived flightless birds, like cassowary, have glossy feathers
similar in structure to iridescent feathers. Photo by Scott Hamlin, licensed.
Cassowary feathers are black, not blue or iridescent, but they're not matte black like those of ostriches. Instead, they have a highly visible glossy sheen. According to Maia et al. (2011), glossy feathers represent sort of an "intermediate" (structurally, if not necessarily evolutionarily) between matte feathers and iridescent feathers. The keratin layer in barbules of glossy and iridescent feathers are similar, and the difference appears to be only in the level of organization of the underlying melanin. So, since modern ratites have glossy feathers, there's really no physical or biological reason why they could not evolve iridescence. The fact that there are no iridescent large derived flightless birds today might simply be a matter of small sample size, or environmental/behavioral influences. I think the same would be true of troodontids.

Illustration of cassowary feather. Despite a simple overall structure, it is
 complex enough to display structurally-created gloss. From this e-book.
To make a long story short, are blue troodontids plausible? I would say, based on what I've read about structural color, probably yes. It appears that any animal with barbules can produce structural color of some kind. Since we know the ancestors of troodontids had barbules and structural color, and since modern analogues don't necessarily lose the necessary components of structural color along with overall feather complexity, restoring an iridescent blue troodontid would be reasonable. I'm not sure about the kind of bright, matte-blue color found in jays and bluebirds, which I believe are created via a slightly more complex process, but at least iridescent blue should be within the realm of possibility for any stem-bird which can plausibly be hypothesized to retain barbules.

Of course, an additional consideration may be that same issue of behavior. Blue feathers appear to be possible for troodonts, but are they likely based on inferred lifestyle? Troodonts are usually thought to be predators of small vertebrates, possibly nocturnal. Today, nocturnal birds are almost never iridescent, and even diurnal predatory birds tend not to have much in the way of flashy colors. So while iridescent coloration is plausible for troodontids based on biology, it may be less so based on likely behavior.

References
Maia, R., D'Alba, L., & Shawkey, M. D. (2011). What makes a feather shine? A nanostructural basis for glossy black colours in feathersProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences278(1714), 1973-1980.
Monge-Nájera, J., & Hernández, F. (1994). Spatial organization of the structural color system in the quetzal, Pharomachrus mocinno (Aves: Trogonidae) and evolutionary implicationsRevista de BiologiaTropical42, 131-139.

1 comment:

  1. Caudipteryx shows that arm and hand reduction does not mean feather complexity reduction.

    ReplyDelete